← Search

Alex Vizgaitis

Fayetteville, NY
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
167 matches · 118W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alex Vizgaitis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history167 matches
L
2026-06-14 · Perry · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kuniko Okada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · with Joon Young Kim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · with Marcus J Brooks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · with Marcus J Brooks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · with Marcus J Brooks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · with Marcus J Brooks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Tracy Sladish / Connor Darcy
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matthew Funiciello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kurran Singh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Connor Darcy / Emily Esther
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joon Young Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nam-Jung Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-01 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nam-Jung Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-01-16 · #1 Doubles · with Jessica Schlosser championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
76.1%
35W–11L · 60.1% of games
4.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 59.4% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.3% of games
8.0mixed
82.9%
34W–7L · 60.1% of games
9.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
27 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams