← Search

JACOB PEREZ

Haworth, NJ
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 74W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add JACOB PEREZ to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-07-16 · We Hit Different · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Belmonte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sherla Glasgow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-09 · We Hit Different · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Oliver Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
Sven Richter / Joseph Graziano
2026-06-30 · Coyle/Mira · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Peter Todoric
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-28 · Sandman · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Manan Pandya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-06-25 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sherla Glasgow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-25 · We Hit Different · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Morhaf Mahrous
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-23 · Coyle/Mira · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Peter Todoric
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-06-18 · We Hit Different · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Morhaf Mahrous
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kate Seaman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Coyle/Mira · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vladimir Koch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-06-07 · Sandman · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with James Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
65%
39W–21L · 55.7% of games
5.0
60%
6W–4L · 59.5% of games
8.0mixed
63%
17W–10L · 53.3% of games
9.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
31 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer