← Search

Amber Fagan

Omaha, NE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 13W–31L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amber Fagan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
L
2026-06-24 · NE/Obermier/18&Over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsie Hardison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · NE/Obermier/18&Over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Winter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-03 · NE/Obermier/18&Over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsie Hardison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-06 · NE/Obermier/18&Over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Winter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-03 · McDill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginger Garfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-22 · McDill · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginger Garfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-15 · McDill · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginger Garfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-09 · McDill · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Shehan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-18 · McDill · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah McDill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-06-11 · McDill · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiely Madhavan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-28 · McDill · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiely Madhavan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
Julie Davis / Cheryl Schmidt
2025-04-13 · Kephart/Hass · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
29.5%
13W–31L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
9 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert