← Search

Deborah McDill

Papillion, NE
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 58W–47L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Deborah McDill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
W
2026-08-31 · Simmonds/Siebken · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Sindelar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · Simmonds/Siebken · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Grant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-29 · Obermier · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicholas Yeutter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-13 · Obermier · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicholas Yeutter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-01 · NE/Obermier/18&Over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kersten Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · Obermier · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicholas Yeutter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-22 · NE/Raikes/18&Over3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Konigsberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-20 · NE/Nastase/55&Over7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jo Lehan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-17 · NE/Obermier/18&Over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Slezak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-15 · NE/Nastase/55&Over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brandi Goldapp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · NE/Nastase/55&Over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Schmaderer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-13 · NE/Nastase/55&Over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brandi Goldapp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
54%
27W–23L · 52.8% of games
3.5
42.3%
11W–15L · 46.4% of games
7.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 68.3% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 45.5% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
21 matches
#1 Singles
11%
11 matches
#2 Singles
10%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova