← Search

Julie Fulton

— year-end
101 matches · 71W–30L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Julie Fulton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
W
2026-08-19 · Lancaster CC Beanie Babes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebekah Landis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · Lancaster CC Beanie Babes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebekah Landis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-11 · Lancaster CC Beanie Babes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebekah Landis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-04 · Lancaster CC Beanie Babes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Belser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · Lancaster CC Beanie Babes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Belser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-07 · Lancaster CC Court Crushers - Mallon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebekah Landis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-29 · Lancaster CC Court Crushers - Mallon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebekah Landis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · Lancaster CC Beanie Babes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Beans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-09 · Lancaster CC Beanie Babes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebekah Landis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-16 · Lancaster CC Beanie Babes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Beth Filling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · Lancaster CC Court Crushers - Mallon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Mallon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-04 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebekah Landis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams27 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
82.4%
14W–3L · 61.2% of games
3.5
61.8%
21W–13L · 53.5% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
100%
8W–0L · 67.6% of games
7.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 62.6% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer