← Search

Susan Wolf

— year-end
108 matches · 56W–52L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Susan Wolf to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history108 matches
W
2026-08-19 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with KIM FRUIN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with KIM FRUIN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-11 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-30 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tricia Stillman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-23 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with KIM FRUIN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-26 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-29 · Hempfield - Campbell / Tait · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adam Gochnauer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-13 · Hempfield - Campbell · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Saul Cohen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-05 · Bent Creek - Mieszkalski · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Crosetto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-19 · Bent Creek - Mieszkalski · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Crosetto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-13 · Hempfield - Campbell / Tait · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Greg Godshall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
Teams34 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 64.8% of games
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 69.9% of games
3.5
55%
11W–9L · 48.9% of games
6.0
80%
4W–1L · 63.4% of games
7.0
46.7%
14W–16L · 47.4% of games
6.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 50.8% of games
7.0mixed
25%
5W–15L · 42.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
28 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer