← Search

Jill Gray

Woodstock, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 53W–62L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Jill Gray to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
W
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aubrie Powderly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Summers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Lodisio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Connie Rouls / Lois Robichaud
2026-02-22 · Baymeadows - Andersen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sampat Choudhary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-20 · Duval/Wilkinson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ezekiel Haigler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
Aura Bernal
2026-02-15 · Baymeadows - Andersen · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-02-13 · Duval/Wilkinson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mohamad Itani mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-01-30 · Duval/Wilkinson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mohamad Itani mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Brittany Rutherford / Holly Worrell
2025-12-05 · #1 Doubles · with Julie Korsog championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
37%
20W–34L · 46.6% of games
6.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 63.3% of games
7.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 44.7% of games
7.0mixed
61.3%
19W–12L · 52.9% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
35 matches
#1 Singles
18%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert