← Search

Cathy Cox

Woodstock, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
88 matches · 69W–19L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Cathy Cox to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history88 matches
L
2026-08-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Coalson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Banet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Coalson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Erin Dwyer
2026-07-09 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 7-6
W
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Banet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebekah Caler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Nancy Gary / Maggie McKnight
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eve Tubman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashlee Teli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-21 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-14 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 7-6
L
2026-03-10 · River Green - Cathy Cox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Banet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-02-06 · River Green - Cathy Cox · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Banet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
78.4%
69W–19L · 59.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
33 matches
#1 Singles
28%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
12 matches
#2 Singles
14%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal