← Search

Nadine Kim

— year-end
186 matches · 90W–96L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nadine Kim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history186 matches
L
2026-05-19 · CV-Sun City Palm Desert/Kim · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Bouffard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · with Maria Himelman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · with Ann Crampton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-10 · CV-Sun City Palm Desert/Kim · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deb Garris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-01 · CV-Woodhaven/McCann & Monk · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marian Zalewski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-31 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patti Groves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-03-28 · CV-LLW-Del Webb Rancho Mirage/L Gagnon · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lesley Gagnon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lesley Gagnon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lesley Gagnon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-03-16 · CV-Sun City PD/Greenman & Kim · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Robitaille
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-02-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lesley Gagnon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-02-23 · CV-Sun City PD/Greenman & Kim · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Robitaille
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
75%
30W–10L · 54.8% of games
4.0
38.5%
20W–32L · 44% of games
4.5
0%
0W–6L · 21.5% of games
7.0
65.1%
28W–15L · 55.8% of games
7.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 46.7% of games
8.0
21.7%
5W–18L · 40.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
41 matches
#1 Singles
17%
32 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal