← Search

Lesley Gagnon

— year-end
152 matches · 68W–84L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lesley Gagnon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
L
2026-05-21 · CV-Sun City Palm Desert/Kim · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Tennyson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-07 · CV-Sun City Palm Desert/Kim · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Himelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-26 · CV-Sun City Palm Desert/Kim · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · CV-Sun City Palm Desert/Kim · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Himelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-31 · CV-Sun City PD/Groves · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-03-28 · CV-LLW-Del Webb Rancho Mirage/L Gagnon · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nadine Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-25 · CV-Sun City PD/Groves · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nadine Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-23 · CV-Del Webb Rancho Mirage/C Wright & M Fox · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mindy Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-18 · CV-Sun City PD/Groves · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nadine Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-02-25 · CV-Sun City PD/Groves · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nadine Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-02-18 · CV-Sun City PD/Groves · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nadine Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-02-14 · CV-LLW-Del Webb Rancho Mirage/L Gagnon · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams54 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
43.4%
33W–43L · 46.2% of games
4.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 38.7% of games
7.0
54.1%
20W–17L · 52.8% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 57.4% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 46.2% of games
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 38.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
38 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe