← Search

Carolyn Fox-Robertson

Madison, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 17W–24L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carolyn Fox-Robertson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-02-13 · LS:Bacon and Legs:Fuller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Kenney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-01 · LS:Set 2 Win!:Burlingham · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-18 · LS:Set 2 Win!:Burlingham · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-04 · LS:Bacon and Legs:Fuller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Kenney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-12-05 · LS:Bacon and Legs:Fuller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Kenney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-08 · LS:Bacon and Legs:Fuller · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with EARL Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-02 · LS:Set 2 Win!:Burlingham · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Connie Hurtt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2025-10-12 · LS:Set 2 Win!:Burlingham · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Luner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-01 · LS:McAuliffe · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Dibacco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2025-05-13 · LS:McAuliffe · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karin Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2024-07-16 · LS:65& 8.0:McAuliffe · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Landers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-08 · LS:65& 8.0:McAuliffe · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Suzanne Mc Auliffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
40%
4W–6L · 43.6% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 44.4% of games
8.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 45.7% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.5% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova