← Search

Marc Hossack

Parker, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 26W–14L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Marc Hossack to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
L
2026-09-01 · CR-DC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barry Shockley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-18 · CR-DC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-11 · CR-DC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Fujita
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-28 · CR-DC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Fujita
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-21 · CR-DC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · DCHS RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Fujita
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-07 · DCHS RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Travis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-30 · DCHS RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Dutcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-06-23 · DCHS RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Dutcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-16 · DCHS RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-11 · PCC RED · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Milhan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-09 · DCHS RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barry Shockley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
65.4%
17W–9L · 54.6% of games
7.0
70%
7W–3L · 58.5% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
22 matches
#1 Singles
23%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer