← Search

Jason Abrams

Englewood, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 79W–23L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jason Abrams to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history102 matches
W
2026-08-29 · RRTC YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Yvette Watson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-25 · CCV ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Sachen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-18 · CCV ORANGE · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · RRTC YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Behm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-04 · CCV ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Josh Heckendorf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-28 · CCV ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · RRTC YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marissa Murray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Lauren Behm championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Lauren Behm championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Sarah Turner championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · RRTC YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Behm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-14 · CCV RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chad Mezvinsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
81.8%
18W–4L · 65.1% of games
3.5
71.8%
28W–11L · 58.3% of games
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 54.3% of games
7.0mixed
90.9%
20W–2L · 66.8% of games
7.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 58.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
30 matches
#1 Singles
14%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
10 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams