← Search

Kirsten Willis

— year-end
185 matches · 91W–94L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kirsten Willis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history185 matches
L
2026-09-05 · McMullen Double Shots · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Gerlach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-29 · McMullen Double Shots · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dianne Albina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-21 · Seminole Lake Dsa 7.5 W · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-20 · McMullen Double Shots · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kayla Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · McMullen Double Shots · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dianne Albina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Tania Biller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Amy Barrett championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Amy Barrett championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · Seminole Lake Dsa 7.5 W · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natalie Hensgen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · Seminole Lake Dsa 7.5 W · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Martha Cornatzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-19 · #4 Doubles · with Katherine Oliveira championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Kaitlyn Caterinicchia championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
Teams55 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
61.7%
29W–18L · 57.3% of games
4.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 41.8% of games
7.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 55.9% of games
8.5
44.8%
13W–16L · 49.5% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60.3% of games
8.0mixed
42.6%
20W–27L · 46% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 22.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
47 matches
#1 Singles
7%
13 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer