← Search

Stephanie Means

— year-end
120 matches · 89W–31L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Means to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-08-29 · Tarpon Kronk · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Melissa Sheridan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-5
L
2026-08-20 · Tarpon Kronk · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Uri Covarrubias
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-01 · Tarpon Kronk · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Uri Covarrubias
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-26 · Tarpon Kronk · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Melissa Sheridan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · HCC TRI-AGAIN 5.0/Barkett · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karen MacCormack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-0
W
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · with Dagmar O'Rourke championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · with Karen MacCormack championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Dagmar O'Rourke championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Dianne Albina championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · HCC TRI-AGAIN 5.0/Barkett · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angie Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Lauren Haack / William Morris
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Manuel Alvarez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Manuel Alvarez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
80%
28W–7L · 61.6% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.7% of games
9.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 62.7% of games
9.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 64.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams