← Search

Jeff Schimmelpfennig

Indianapolis, IN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 27W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeff Schimmelpfennig to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
L
2026-07-08 · Indy A18 4.5M NCHS Goldsmith · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andy Gerdt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-28 · Indy A18 4.5M NCHS Goldsmith · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andy Gerdt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-10 · Indy A18 4.5M NCHS Goldsmith · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Flannagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-05-06 · Indy A18 4.5M NCHS Goldsmith · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Jamieson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
Troy Gardner / John Cox
2025-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joe Gentry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
Brad Coffin / Keith Waterman
2025-06-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Charles Hinkle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
Kevin Flannagan / Daniel Schoch
2025-06-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joe Gentry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-08-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steven Brock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
David Barrett / Paul Podgorny
2024-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Adam Bennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-07-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joe Gentry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
John Cox / Scott Paramoure
2024-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joe Gentry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
Daniel Stoddard / Kyle Johnson
2024-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joe Gentry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
39%
23W–36L · 47.5% of games
9.0mixed
25%
4W–12L · 39.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 55% of the time
#2 Doubles
55%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert