← Search

Ryan Jamieson

— year-end
65 matches · 43W–22L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Ryan Jamieson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-07-08 · Indy A18 4.5M NCHS Goldsmith · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Noble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Andrew Voss / AJ Antonelli
2026-05-27 · Indy A18 4.5M NCHS Goldsmith · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Keele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-20 · Indy A18 4.5M NCHS Goldsmith · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-13 · Indy A18 4.5M NCHS Goldsmith · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brad Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-06 · Indy A18 4.5M NCHS Goldsmith · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeff Schimmelpfennig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2025-10-15 · CIN C 8.5M IRCD Redding · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Zach Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-24 · CIN C 8.5M IRCD Redding · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brady Wagenknecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
Kyle Johnson / Daniel Stoddard
2025-09-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Connor Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-09-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Redding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikhil Kulkarni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
Daniel Albert / Nick Reinhart
2025-08-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikhil Kulkarni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-07-16 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Teams3 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
70.5%
31W–13L · 57% of games
5.0
25%
1W–3L · 29.5% of games
8.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.5% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 62.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
30 matches
#1 Singles
32%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova