← Search

JOHN MacDONALD

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
209 matches · 116W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add JOHN MacDONALD to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history209 matches
L
2026-05-16 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ed McDougall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-02 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Chapman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-18 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pej Sabet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-28 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Cimber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-21 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Cimber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-02-14 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with KRISTON QUALLS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-07 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with KRISTON QUALLS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-31 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dennis Wertzler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
AJ Poulin / Jack Stansbery
2026-01-10 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Cimber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-12-06 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with KRISTON QUALLS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-22 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with COLE BOREN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-11-08 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dennis Wertzler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
57.9%
88W–64L · 52.5% of games
7.0
50%
26W–26L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
79 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
44 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova