← Search

JD de Armond

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
211 matches · 121W–90L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add JD de Armond to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history211 matches
L
2026-07-23 · DTC #1 · #3 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Murillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-16 · DTC #1 · #3 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Murillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-10 · DTC #1 · #3 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Michalski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · NV/Austin/18&OverM3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rod Faircloth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-18 · NV/Austin/18&OverM3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rod Faircloth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Ken Kesick / Carter Kessler
2026-04-08 · #1 Doubles · with Gaetano Franceschi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-21 · DTC #3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blair McPhail
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-07 · DTC #3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexander Parunin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-01-31 · DTC #3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blair McPhail
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-01-17 · DTC #3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blair McPhail
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-10 · DTC #3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blair McPhail
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-12-06 · DTC #4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Oskar Dagys
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
73.5%
36W–13L · 59.8% of games
3.5
57.1%
60W–45L · 53.4% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 43.5% of games
6.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 70.7% of games
6.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 26.2% of games
7.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
57 matches
#1 Male Doubles
9%
19 matches
#3 Male Doubles
4%
9 matches
#2 Male Doubles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova