← Search

Rebecca Sandoz

— year-end
75 matches · 51W–24L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Sandoz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
W
2026-08-19 · Enk/40s/4.0-3.0/PAC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crissy Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-17 · Burns/40s/6.5/PAC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Bonanno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · Bonanno-Burns/18s/3.5-2.5/PAC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-11 · Bonanno/18/5.5/PAC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sarah Sulzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-27 · Catt/40s/3.0/PAC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jason Ortis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-22 · Bonanno-Burns/18s/3.5-2.5/PAC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joelle Cuevas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · Enk/40s/3.5/PAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Cuevas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · Enk/40s/4.0-3.0/PAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Landry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · Catt/40s/3.0/PAC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joshua Walker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · Bonanno-Burns/18s/3.5-2.5/PAC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Haley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · Enk/40s/4.0-3.0/PAC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Fran Dominique
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · Catt/40s/3.0/PAC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erik Ernst mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
67.9%
19W–9L · 61% of games
3.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 31.1% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 58% of games
3.0mixed
80%
16W–4L · 62.1% of games
3.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 66.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
21 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams