← Search

Lacey Schwab

— year-end
56 matches · 45W–11L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Lacey Schwab to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Nash/18s/5.5/SC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sarah Robin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-08 · Guillet/18s/6.5/COQ · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin Roy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-01 · Pourciau/18s/6.5/SC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jamie Quartano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-18 · Pourciau/18s/6.5/SC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Elise Schof
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-18 · Guillet/18s/6.5/COQ · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin Roy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Englert/18s/4.0-3.0/SC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Last
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-11 · Schwab/18s/5.5/SC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jenni Abrams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
Elizabeth Gray / Tracey Kern
2026-07-29 · Englert/18s/4.0-3.0/SC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-22 · Englert/18s/4.0-3.0/SC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Layne Neitzschman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · Englert/18s/4.0-3.0/SC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-27 · Smith/18s/3.0/SC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Drew Lindemann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · Englert/18s/4.0-3.0/SC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Roy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Teams17 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
75%
6W–2L · 67.5% of games
3.0
75%
18W–6L · 59.8% of games
3.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 56.9% of games
5.5
100%
9W–0L · 67.3% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 67.6% of games
3.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 68.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
11 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe