← Search

Ann Trentman

Sandy, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
431 matches · 186W–245L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ann Trentman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history431 matches
W
2026-08-29 · Trentman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-25 · Fall Orange Crush · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Kemp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-11 · #3 Doubles · with Robin Simmons championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carla Stoddard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hannah Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathi Poggi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Kemp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carla Stoddard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Kemp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · Drop Shot Divas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams83 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.5% of games
3.5
52.2%
109W–100L · 51.7% of games
4.0
24.8%
28W–85L · 41.8% of games
7.0
57.1%
20W–15L · 54.6% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 45.6% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 43.8% of games
7.5mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 52.4% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
154 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
150 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
104 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
11 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
8 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer