← Search

Shana Wood

Heber City, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
220 matches · 88W–132L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Shana Wood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history220 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Deer Creek Dolls · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elaine Coady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Archibald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carly Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Studdert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carly Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jen Dagley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Archibald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carly Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
54.3%
25W–21L · 51.5% of games
3.0
45.5%
46W–55L · 50.5% of games
3.5
21.7%
15W–54L · 37.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
33 matches
#1 Singles
7%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
14 matches
#2 Female Doubles
6%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer