Emily Nixon
Toledo, OH
575 matches · 315W–260L · seasons 2016–2026
Captains: add Emily Nixon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history575 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
Ashley Gastin / Cindy Gamby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Amy Schmitt / Paula Danis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
Jennifer Smith / Delia Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Julieann Campbell / Emily Reisert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
78.7%
37W–10L · 66.6% of games
4.0
51.9%
109W–101L · 51.9% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 39.6% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 52.5% of games
7.5
57.1%
52W–39L · 55% of games
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 52.1% of games
8.5
41.9%
13W–18L · 48.1% of games
7.0mixed
51.5%
17W–16L · 50.9% of games
8.0mixed
60.7%
54W–35L · 53.4% of games
9.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 54.8% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
212 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
185 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
146 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
16 matches
#1 Singles
2%
14 matches
#2 Singles
0%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.