← Search

Maria van Den Berg

— year-end
43 matches · 14W–29L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Maria van Den Berg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
L
2022-04-08 · Harpers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abby McNerney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-3
W
2022-02-25 · Harpers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Bone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2021-11-12 · Harpers White · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Spooner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2021-10-08 · Harpers White · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Spooner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2021-10-01 · Harpers White · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Schum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 2-1
W
2021-09-17 · Harpers White · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Clancy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2021-07-16 · Harpers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Sanchez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2021-07-15 · Harpers White · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Govert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
Amy Clark / Eugenie Kreutzjans
2021-07-14 · Harpers White · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Donnelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 4-5
W
2021-07-13 · Harpers Red · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Jeanne Johnson / Cynthia Kimener
2021-07-09 · Harpers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Sanchez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2021-07-08 · Harpers White · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Spooner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-2, 1-0
Teams7 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
36.4%
12W–21L · 47% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 58.1% of games
8.0
0%
0W–6L · 28.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova