← Search

Donna Griffor

Mason, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 43W–22L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Donna Griffor to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carol Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
Theresa Schenthal / Eugenie Kreutzjans
2026-07-13 · Queen City Red · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Totin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terri Schantz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · Cincinnati Stephens · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carol Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-19 · Cincinnati Stephens · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dara Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carol Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Bryce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-05 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Bonnie Lang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
Phyllis Mendoza / Tracy Shetty
2026-03-13 · Queen City Orange · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Buddemeyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-5
L
Stephanie Moler / Amanda Ehme
2026-02-13 · Queen City Orange · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-2
L
2025-12-12 · Queen City Orange · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
58.1%
25W–18L · 53.9% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
100%
15W–0L · 73.5% of games
9.0
25%
1W–3L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova