Jennifer Schafer
Loveland, CO
100 matches · 41W–59L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Jennifer Schafer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history100 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Brian Smith / Elizabeth Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 57.1% of games
4.0
43.6%
34W–44L · 47.7% of games
8.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 41.4% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 37.7% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.8% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.