← Search

Meredith Lorick

Loveland, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
154 matches · 106W–48L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Meredith Lorick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history154 matches
W
2026-08-17 · LVTA RED · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-10 · LVTA RED · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-03 · LVTA RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Schafer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-27 · LVTA RED · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-26 · LVTA PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrew Dillon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-23 · FCCC SILVER · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-20 · LVTA RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonda Huhta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-17 · LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Fernandez-Grant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-16 · FCCC SILVER · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · FCCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Kepner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-12 · LVTA PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrew Dillon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · FCCC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Kepner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
90.5%
38W–4L · 70.5% of games
4.0
69.6%
48W–21L · 59.9% of games
7.5mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 49% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
9W–12L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 38% of the time
#1 Singles
38%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
10 matches
#2 Singles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams