Laime Hattenbach
31 matches · 10W–21L · seasons 2019–2025
Captains: add Laime Hattenbach to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history31 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-5
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
Teams13 teams · 2021–2025
4S:The Banger Sisters:Schmidt/Stewart
CP:Net Gains 40+ Winter:das Neves/Sweet
WRC:Well Seasoned: Griffin
CP:Net Gains 40+ Winter:das Neves/Sweet
Laime Hattenbach
CP:Mixed Signals:das Neves/Pon
CP:Net Gains 40+ Winter:das Neves/Sweet
CP:Net Gains Summer:das Neves/Sweet
CP:Net Gains 40+:das Neves/Sweet
CP:Net Gains Summer:das Neves/Sweet
CP:Net Gains 40+:das Neves/Sweet
CP:Net Gains:das Neves/Sweet
CP:New Gains 18+ Winter:das Neves/Sweet
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.7% of games
4.0
25%
4W–12L · 45.7% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 48.1% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
9 matches
#1 Singles
19%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.