← Search

Ali Campbell

Rye, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
306 matches · 169W–137L · seasons 2018–2026

Captains: add Ali Campbell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history306 matches
W
Bret Sommer / Leah Butler
2026-07-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Kemer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7
W
2026-07-13 · SOL:Love Means Nothing:Thompson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-06 · SOL:Love Means Nothing:Thompson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with June Hatch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-17 · MIC: Holmes/Hatch - 18+ 4.0 W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christy Schultze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole van Maanen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-5
W
2026-06-10 · MIC: Holmes/Hatch - 18+ 4.0 W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Rosenblum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Lea Sergiacomi / Danielle Weiss
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Bave
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
Margot Sweeney / Kelly Whipple
2026-05-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lizzie Bommer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-05-11 · SOL:Love Means Nothing:Thompson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole van Maanen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
72.7%
16W–6L · 60.5% of games
3.5
53.3%
64W–56L · 51.5% of games
4.0
57.9%
73W–53L · 51.1% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 40.7% of games
8.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
123 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
93 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
70 matches
#1 Singles
4%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer