← Search

Julie Fuller

— year-end
146 matches · 36W–110L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julie Fuller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history146 matches
L
2026-06-21 · Smith, Mindy · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with JUDY STAROSCIK
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-14 · Jensen, Jacqui · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Pflanz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-07 · Smith, Mindy · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · Jensen, Jacqui · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Pflanz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-31 · Smith, Mindy · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mindy Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-09 · Smith, Mindy · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lora Mccurdy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-12 · Smith, Mindy · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-03-15 · Loepp, Kathy · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irene Harkleroad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-03-09 · Jensen, Patty · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alicia Fremont
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-05 · Cowen, Patricia · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Pulford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-02 · Jensen, Patty · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-01 · Loepp, Kathy · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Czir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Teams34 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
25%
10W–30L · 39.6% of games
3.5
17.7%
14W–65L · 37.2% of games
6.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 50.5% of games
7.0
30%
3W–7L · 42.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
43%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
14 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal