← Search

Tracy Rotter

Lakewood, CO
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 56W–61L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tracy Rotter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
W
2026-07-30 · BCST RED · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Mucilli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-28 · BCST RED · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Laurie van Sickle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-23 · BCST RED · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Leon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-16 · BCST RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maryann Barwick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · BCST RED · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Laurie van Sickle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-02 · BCST RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janis Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-01 · BCST RED · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Leslie Aranjo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-24 · BCST RED · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jody Monroe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-17 · BCST RED · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-03 · BCST RED · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ann Symalla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-31 · BCST RED · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ann Symalla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-27 · BCST RED · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jody Monroe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
53.7%
36W–31L · 52.9% of games
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 33.3% of games
6.0
38.1%
8W–13L · 44.4% of games
5.5mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 60% of games
6.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
18 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer