← Search

Mary Mittag-Miller

Golden, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 14W–30L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Mittag-Miller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
L
2026-07-30 · MVCC RED · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patti Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-23 · MVCC RED · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Eiseman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-16 · MVCC RED · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Eiseman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · MVCC RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Eiseman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-07-17 · MVCC RED · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Hassinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-07-10 · MVCC RED · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Lea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-06-26 · MVCC RED · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Lea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2022-06-15 · NJ TEAL · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Bare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2022-06-11 · NJ TEAL · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christie Bibeau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
Amy Dodd / Kathy Webber
2022-05-22 · NJ TEAL · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Shields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
Ann Larson / Cheri Belz
2022-05-18 · NJ TEAL · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Shields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2022-05-11 · NJ TEAL · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Shields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–9L · 33.7% of games
6.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 64.3% of games
7.0
32.1%
9W–19L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams