Rafael Molina
45 matches · 15W–30L · seasons 2022–2026
Captains: add Rafael Molina to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history45 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Chris Erickson / Philip Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Knights at Court/Heum/El Cariso
Knights at Court/Heum/El Cariso
Magnificent 8/Heum/El Cariso
SGV Ball Hogs-Yip-Arroyo/SU4
SGV Mixed Underdogs 55-Diamond Bar HS/SU10
SGV Mixed Underdogs-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU8
SGV Underdogs 55-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU10
SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SA2
SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SU2
SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SU2
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
33.3%
6W–12L · 40.8% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 37.8% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
36.8%
7W–12L · 43.9% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
14 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.