← Search

Ennie Gonzaga

Temple City, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
205 matches · 112W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ennie Gonzaga to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history205 matches
L
2026-08-01 · SGV Mixed Underdogs 55-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ted Nuguid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-26 · SGV Mixed Underdogs 55-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rafael Molina mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrew Mesdjian mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ted Nuguid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-31 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Yu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Travis Hatfield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ted Nuguid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ted Nuguid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ted Nuguid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Yu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Yu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Yu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
66.7%
36W–18L · 58.9% of games
4.0
46.9%
15W–17L · 49.7% of games
7.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 70.6% of games
8.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.9% of games
0.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 54.5% of games
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.1% of games
7.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 58.2% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
35.5%
22W–40L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
60 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert