← Search

Daniel Moe

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 29W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Daniel Moe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history108 matches
W
2026-07-15 · EM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pat Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-08 · EM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Paulling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-01 · EM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pat Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · EM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hayes Trotter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-03 · EM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregory Fritsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-27 · EM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Ekedahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-20 · EM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pat Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-13 · EM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hayes Trotter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-10 · EM NAVY · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Colley Moe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-06 · EM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Mahoney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-03 · EM NAVY · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Colley Moe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-29 · EM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Paulling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
33.8%
26W–51L · 43.5% of games
8.0mixed
9.7%
3W–28L · 36.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 58% of the time
#3 Doubles
58%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams