← Search

Marcus McAskin

Englewood, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 41W–37L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Marcus McAskin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
W
2026-08-23 · GAC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathy Norford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-15 · GAC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Runda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
Eric Teruel / Tim Lloyd
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Michael Barney championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Patrick Reed championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Patrick Reed championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · GAC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Runda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-13 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2026-05-29 · GAC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Hipshman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-27 · GAC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-22 · GAC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Hipshman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-20 · GAC RED · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-13 · GAC RED · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
49.1%
27W–28L · 48.7% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 63.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
14 matches
#1 Singles
15%
12 matches
#2 Singles
9%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams