← Search

Lesley MacLeod

— year-end
217 matches · 127W–90L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lesley MacLeod to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history217 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Satoko Tanimoto championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Ann Zaminski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-18 · GRC: Greenwich Racquet Club: Leon/Zaminski · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Satoko Tanimoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Zaminski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-30 · GRC: Greenwich Racquet Club: Leon/Zaminski · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Wells
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Zaminski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Erin Harris / June Hatch
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lourdes Marti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Zaminski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-09 · GRC: Greenwich Racquet Club: Leon/Zaminski · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Zaminski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-03-31 · Greenwich Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Zaminski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-17 · Greenwich Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-03-13 · GRC: 4.0 18 :Leon/Zaminski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Hentemann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Teams45 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
95.2%
20W–1L · 66.1% of games
4.0
55.9%
95W–75L · 52.7% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 70% of the time
#1 Doubles
70%
151 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
38 matches
#1 Singles
7%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
13 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer