← Search

Denise Kodjo

Bronx, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
147 matches · 95W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Denise Kodjo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history147 matches
L
2026-07-18 · SOL: Mind Benders: Keefe · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Abbey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Keira Smith / Amy Suehnholz
2026-07-16 · Keefe · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Tobak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-13 · #3 Doubles · with Katherine Moon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · SOL: Mind Benders: Keefe · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mariko Abdel-Rahman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Moon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
Hayley Radachi / Megan Kelley
2026-06-29 · Keefe · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Marsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · Keefe · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mariko Abdel-Rahman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-24 · Keefe · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Bernstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
Lindsey Anderson / Laura Dupuis
2026-06-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Moon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Rosenthal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-5
W
2026-06-04 · Keefe · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ayako Tsukamoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
100%
7W–0L · 60.6% of games
4.0
61.9%
52W–32L · 52.3% of games
7.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 54.1% of games
8.0mixed
69%
29W–13L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
38 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert