← Search

Elizabeth Delaney

Baton Rouge, LA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 42W–39L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Delaney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
L
2026-05-18 · Searcy/40/Div2/WD/BOC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Dauzat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lilia Carreras
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-03-27 · Searcy/40/3.0/WD/BOC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Phyllis Pedersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-26 · Searcy/40/3.0/WD/BOC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Phyllis Pedersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-03-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Phyllis Pedersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-21 · Delaney/70/3.0/W/LA · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Phyllis Pedersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-20 · Delaney/70/3.0/W/LA · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kay Lambert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-20 · Delaney/70/3.0/W/LA · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Phyllis Pedersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Phyllis Pedersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-06 · Searcy/40/3.0/WD/BOC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Phyllis Pedersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-27 · Searcy/40/3.0/WD/BOC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Uffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
59.7%
40W–27L · 52.9% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 36.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe