← Search

Phyllis Pedersen

— year-end
64 matches · 33W–31L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Phyllis Pedersen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-06-22 · Williamson/55/Div2/WD/BOC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chandel McDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-27 · Searcy/40/3.0/WD/BOC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Delaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-26 · Searcy/40/3.0/WD/BOC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Delaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-03-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Delaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-21 · Delaney/70/3.0/W/LA · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Delaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-20 · Delaney/70/3.0/W/LA · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Delaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-13 · Searcy/40/3.0/WD/BOC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rhonda Searcy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Delaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-06 · Searcy/40/3.0/WD/BOC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Delaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-13 · Searcy/40/3.0/WD/BOC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Delaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-02-06 · Searcy/40/3.0/WD/BOC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Delaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Delaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
61.1%
22W–14L · 55.5% of games
3.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 43.5% of games
6.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams