← Search

Greg Loomis

Midlothian, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 19W–18L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Greg Loomis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
W
2026-07-25 · 40+ Bressler - Willow Oaks Gents · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Boyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · 40+ Bressler - Willow Oaks Gents · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terence Blackwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-6
L
2026-06-21 · 40+ Bressler - Willow Oaks Gents · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Frei
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-20 · 40+ Bressler - Willow Oaks Gents · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keyur Shah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-02 · WOCC Blackwood · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Aschheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-26 · WOCC Blackwood · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Port
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-12 · WOCC Blackwood · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kellen Macdonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-05 · WOCC Blackwood · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Frei
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-14 · WOCC Blackwood · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terence Blackwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-25 · 23 Haas 7.0 WOCC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mansi Shah mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-2
L
2026-02-08 · 23 Haas 7.0 WOCC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheri Stringer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-5
L
2026-01-18 · 23 Haas 7.0 WOCC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Kennedy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 57.5% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 43.3% of games
7.5mixed
50%
7W–7L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 49% of the time
#3 Doubles
49%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams