← Search

Daniel Marien

Newark, DE
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 56W–96L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Daniel Marien to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
L
2026-08-06 · IOS - Greenbank Shepherd - 6 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-31 · IOS - Greenbank Shepherd - 6 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Edward Berger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-10 · Courting Players · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anush Parikh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-06 · Courting Players · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kumar Pandit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-01 · Delawarriors · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Imir Ransom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-29 · Called to Serve · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Derik Zhou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-25 · IOS - Greenbank Shepherd - 6 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Volk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-19 · Courting Players · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Hearn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-14 · Courting Players · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Hearn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · Courting Players · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Hearn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-18 · Delawarriors · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Hearn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-05-05 · Delawarriors · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Dinh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
43.6%
34W–44L · 47.5% of games
3.5
16.7%
6W–30L · 33.8% of games
6.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.8% of games
7.0mixed
41.9%
13W–18L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
44 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer