← Search

Michael Hartman

— year-end
162 matches · 81W–81L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Michael Hartman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history162 matches
L
2026-08-06 · IOS - Greenbank Shepherd - 6 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniel Marien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-23 · DuPont Greens · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edward Bouscaren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2
W
2026-07-22 · DuPont Greens · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edward Bouscaren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-13 · DuPont Greens · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edward Bouscaren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · IOS - Greenbank Shepherd - 6 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-06 · Dupont Ovals · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Tate
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-30 · DuPont Greens · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edward Bouscaren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-29 · Penn Ball Wizards · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas Munro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-25 · IOS - Greenbank Shepherd - 6 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Domenic Christopher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-24 · Penn Ball Wizards · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jon Seiler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-14 · Penn Ball Wizards · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deep Kahlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-08 · DuPont Greens · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edward Bouscaren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Teams12 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
51.6%
33W–31L · 52.5% of games
3.5
50%
7W–7L · 52.3% of games
6.0
40.9%
9W–13L · 45.9% of games
7.0
75%
9W–3L · 59.7% of games
6.0mixed
46%
23W–27L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe