← Search

Janet Waren

Wilmington, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 23W–21L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Janet Waren to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Senter CFCC 18+ 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elise Rouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-08 · Cooke/Gardner · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Melissa Straub
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-09-06 · Egger/Nelson · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jeanne-Marie Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · Egger/Nelson · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-02 · Egger/Nelson · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jeanne-Marie Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-01 · Cooke/Gardner · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Natasha Hilburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
Jill Scerri / Anna Owen
2026-08-31 · Senter CFCC 18+ 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heather Senter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-4
W
2026-08-26 · Egger/Nelson · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rachel Bonfiglio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · Egger/Nelson · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jeanne-Marie Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-17 · Senter CFCC 18+ 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heather Senter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-15 · Egger/Nelson · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Eakin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-01 · Janik · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ward Coleman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 51.5% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 51.7% of games
8.5
50%
6W–6L · 49.4% of games
4.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
39%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer