← Search

Carolyn Hickman

Wilmington, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 49W–19L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Carolyn Hickman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-09-07 · Hickman 8.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alexis Steele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-06 · Hickman 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madison Seidel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · Hickman 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kylie Knapp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-11 · Niggebrugge/Parker 9.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Guilherme Perez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-11 · Wilson/Parker Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Helen Mathias-Hinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Sarah Thomas / Corbin Carroll
2026-07-15 · Niggebrugge/Parker 9.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Mirzoyan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
Andrew Gillespie / Sarah Thomas
2026-06-15 · Niggebrugge/Parker 9.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Mirzoyan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
Sarah Thomas / Elizabeth Eakin
2026-05-21 · Parker/Glasgow · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Krystal Glasgow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Brooke Johnson / Emily Schaefer
2026-05-18 · Parker/Glasgow · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Renata Kuperus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-29 · Parker/Glasgow · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ada Grace Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-18 · Parker/Glasgow · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katie Swain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-01 · Parker/Glasgow · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 66% of games
4.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 58.2% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 70.1% of games
4.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 60.5% of games
4.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
15 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer