← Search

Jim Minard

Beavercreek, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 50W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jim Minard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
W
2025-10-05 · KTC Aguilera · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Pinard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-07-17 · KTC Aguilera · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bart Grunenwald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Rick Quigley / David Allen
2025-07-10 · KTC Aguilera · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vidyashankar Revan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-04-05 · KTC Aguilera · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Carpenter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-03-22 · KTC Aguilera · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Maurer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
John Bailey / Jeff Bork
2025-03-08 · KTC Aguilera · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Dooley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
Christopher Sigler / Joseph Graham
2025-02-16 · KTC Aguilera · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Maurer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-01-05 · KTC Compton · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-12-21 · KTC Compton · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Carpenter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2024-11-16 · FSSC Klank · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Conrad Klank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Adam Beiersdorfer / Andrew Schulz
2024-10-13 · FSSC Klank · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Peter Gauby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2024-09-28 · KTC Compton · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keith Boroczk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
55.7%
34W–27L · 54.8% of games
4.5
9.5%
2W–19L · 33.7% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
93.3%
14W–1L · 64.1% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#1 Singles
12%
12 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams