← Search

Gopal Bhat

Springboro, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
197 matches · 128W–69L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gopal Bhat to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history197 matches
W
2026-08-16 · QRRC-Burkle · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Becky Dye mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-15 · KTC-Paynter · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with SCOTT WELDE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-26 · QRRC-Burkle · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Becky Dye mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-19 · KTC-Christman · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alexander Boardman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-27 · QRRC-Trubee · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Darrin Heinz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · KTC-Paynter · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Songer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · QRRC-Trubee · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Danielle Menningmann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · QRRC-Burkle · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Burkle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-06 · QRRC-Trubee · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-30 · QRRC-Trubee · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Darrin Heinz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-16 · QRRC-Trubee · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with James Riggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-05-08 · QRRC-Trubee · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jessica Haney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
79.6%
74W–19L · 58.5% of games
4.5
27.5%
11W–29L · 43.1% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
100%
5W–0L · 61.9% of games
7.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 61.5% of games
8.0mixed
70.3%
26W–11L · 55.4% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 21.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
33 matches
#1 Singles
6%
11 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe