← Search

Philip Lancaster

Gainesville, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
318 matches · 91W–227L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Philip Lancaster to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history318 matches
W
2026-09-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lawrence Hooghuis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · JTC/Lancaster · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Blythe Karow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-21 · JTC/Lancaster · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Woolley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-09 · JTC/Lancaster · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victoria Verunac mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-28 · JTC/Lancaster · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tiffany Schmidt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · JTC Lancaster · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa King mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-12 · JTC Lancaster Men · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gregg Fissenden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-05 · JTC Lancaster Men · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gregg Fissenden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-22 · JTC Lancaster · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rachael Seidler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-4
L
2026-05-17 · JTC Lancaster Men · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steven Laux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-16 · JTC Lancaster · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa King mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-15 · JTC Lancaster Men · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dale Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams65 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
34.2%
26W–50L · 44.5% of games
3.5
27.8%
5W–13L · 43.3% of games
6.0
70%
7W–3L · 58.9% of games
6.5
30.2%
13W–30L · 38.9% of games
7.0
18.8%
3W–13L · 42% of games
6.0mixed
27.6%
24W–63L · 41.7% of games
7.0mixed
17.6%
9W–42L · 31% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
113 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
102 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
101 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer