← Search

Blythe Karow

Gainesville, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 45W–105L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Blythe Karow to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
W
2026-08-23 · JTC/Lancaster · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Philip Lancaster mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-16 · JTC/Lancaster · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maxim Peterson . mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-24 · JTC/Lancaster · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gnanavel Subramaniam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-21 · JTC/Lancaster · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maxim Peterson . mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · JTC/Lancaster · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gregg Fissenden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-10 · Alachua/Rodriguez · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Zerbe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · Alachua/Rodriguez · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colleen Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · Alachua/Rodriguez · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Zerbe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-01 · Alachua/Rodriguez · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colleen Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-19 · Alachua/Rodriguez · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Zerbe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-28 · JTC - 18 Love · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Jewell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-11 · JTC - 18 Love · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Arnold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
33.9%
21W–41L · 41.2% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
40%
4W–6L · 48.9% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 40.7% of games
6.0mixed
37%
10W–17L · 40.9% of games
7.0mixed
12.9%
4W–27L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
43 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert